Navigating the Complexities of Interpol’s Red Notice System: Insights from Legal Experts

The future of Interpol and the adherence of its members to the rule of law is fundamental to its operation – a recent International Bar Association webinar [a recording can be found here ], brought together experts from the US Department of Justice, the Commission for the Control of Interpol’s Files (CCF), and prominent legal practitioners to assess the current state of Interpol’s Red Notice system, focusing on rule of law issues, how the organisation addresses potential abuses, and ongoing efforts for improvement.

Mary Rodriguez, Interpol’s former General Counsel and Executive Director of Legal Affairs highlighted  improvements of recent years aimed at enhancing Interpol’s Red Notice system.  These include updated legal frameworks, establishment of the Notices and Diffusions Task Force in 2016 for pre-circulation reviews and implementing corrective measures for rule-violating member countries, such as supervision of activities or partial suspension of data processing privileges. In a bid for increased transparency, the organization has initiated the publication of comprehensive statistics on Red Notices and their associated compliance rates. This suite of reforms collectively addresses long-standing apprehensions regarding the potential misuse of the system by certain member states, marking a significant step towards enhanced accountability and operational integrity.

Despite these improvements, the panel highlighted several ongoing challenges. Ben Keith, a leading barrister, expert in Red Notice removals and Editor at Red Notice Monitor , underscored the system’s persistent susceptibility to exploitation by authoritarian states targeting political dissidents, religious minorities, or ethnic groups. The pursuit of Uyghurs by China was cited as a salient example, illustrating the potential for political machinations under the veneer of legitimate law enforcement.

Keith emphasised the significant challenge for the CCF in distinguishing between genuine criminal cases and politically motivated pursuits without blanket banning certain countries based solely on the information provided to Interpol. According to Keith, this is because the Red Notice system is an information sharing system: “ If that information is corrupted or made for nefarious means, then even examination by somebody who is educated and understands the political and human rights complexities, is not always going to be able to tell that something is in fact not right with the prosecution.”

The panel agreed that this difficulty is at the heart of the system’s vulnerability to abuse. Even with educated examination, it is not always possible to discern the true nature of a case at first glance.

Resource constraints emerged as a recurring theme throughout the discussion. Both Interpol and the CCF face limitations in their ability to thoroughly and swiftly examine cases due to insufficient funding and personnel which directly impacts the efficiency and effectiveness of the Red Notice system.

Interpol expert Dr. Giulio Calcara of the University of Plymouth emphasized an often-overlooked aspect of Red Notices: their de facto legal effect, despite their non-binding nature. He noted that approximately one-third of Interpol member countries execute provisional arrests based on Red Notices, effectively rendering them the closest equivalent to an international arrest warrant in practice. This de facto legal effect can lead to violations of human rights, highlighting the need for rigorous safeguards and oversight mechanisms.

Dr. Susie Alegre, a current member of the CCF, provided insights into the commission’s structure and function. Established in its current form in 2017, the CCF serves as an independent body providing oversight and accountability for Interpol’s data processing. It has the power to issue binding decisions and adopt provisional measures to block notices pending final decisions, adding a crucial layer of protection against potential abuses.

However, the CCF faces significant challenges of its own. The commission is dealing with a rapidly growing caseload, with requests increasing from 1,643 in 2021 to 2,551 in 2023. This surge in cases strains the CCF’s limited resources and impacts its ability to process requests in a timely manner. Despite these challenges, the CCF’s work has yielded important results. Between 2020 and 2022, the commission found 57-61% of admissible cases to be non-compliant with Interpol’s rules, demonstrating both the necessity of its oversight and the scale of the issues within the Red Notice system.

The panel identified several areas where the Red Notice system could be enhanced.

A primary concern is the need for increased resources:

• Additional funding and personnel are crucial to process cases more quickly and improve communication with applicants. This would not only enhance the efficiency of the system but also reduce the potential for harm to individuals wrongly targeted by Red Notices.

Enhanced transparency was another key recommendation:

• Experts called for greater clarity in decision-making processes and reasoning, including more detailed explanations of concepts like "political motivation." This increased openness would not only improve trust in the system but also provide valuable guidance for future cases.

Appeal Mechanism:

• Some panellists suggested allowing appeals of CCF decisions, though concerns were raised about the potential impact on processing times. This highlights the delicate balance between thoroughness and efficiency that the system must navigate.

Improved Dialogue:

• Better communication between Interpol, legal practitioners, and NGOs was recommended to address systemic issues. This collaborative approach could lead to more effective reforms and better-informed decision-making processes.

Member Country Engagement:

• The panel emphasized the crucial role of member countries in advocating for reforms and ensuring accountability within the Interpol framework. As the primary stakeholders in the organization, member countries have the power to drive significant changes through their engagement and advocacy.

The discussion also touched on broader issues of accountability and adherence to rule of law principles. Litigation against Interpol itself remains challenging due to immunity protections, as highlighted by a recent unsuccessful case in the United States. This legal barrier complicates efforts to hold the organization directly accountable for potential misuse of the Red Notice system.

Experts suggested that individuals seeking redress for human rights violations resulting from misuse of Red Notices may need to pursue legal action against the states where the violations occurred, particularly in jurisdictions covered by international human rights instruments like the European Court of Human Rights. This approach, while potentially more viable, places the burden on affected individuals to navigate complex international legal systems.

The panel stressed the importance of member countries, particularly major funders like the EU, US, Canada, and UK, in driving reforms through increased funding and advocacy. These nations have the political and economic influence to push for meaningful changes within Interpol, potentially leading to a more robust and fair Red Notice system.

The expert panel provided a nuanced and multifaceted analysis of Interpol’s Red Notice system, acknowledging significant progress while identifying persistent challenges. As the system continues to evolve, the insights offered by these legal experts underscore the importance of ongoing engagement from member countries, NGOs, and legal professionals. By addressing resource constraints, enhancing transparency, and strengthening safeguards against abuse, Interpol can work towards a more effective and just Red Notice system that balances law enforcement needs with the protection of individual rights.

The path forward requires a delicate balance between efficiency and due process, between international cooperation and respect for human rights. As Interpol navigates these complex issues, continued scrutiny, advocacy, and reform will be essential to ensure that the Red Notice system serves its intended purpose without becoming a tool for oppression or abuse.

If you require legal advice from specialist Interpol Red Notice lawyers about any matter relating to Interpol, please contact us here . You can read more about us, here .